Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Themes
    • Water, Sanitation, Hygiene
    • Integrated Water Resource Management
    • Productivity and Efficiency
    • Governance
  • About
  • Training Resources
  • U.S. Domestic Resources
  • Guidance
    • How to Open a Database File
    • How to Open a Document

User menu

  • Log in
  • Sign up

U.S. Water Partnership Resource Portal

  • Productivity and Efficiency

Evaluation of Fishery and Aquaculture Programs of the Agency for International Development

Link Broken? 
Access this resource
Share
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo
Document (.pdf, .doc)
6,314
Published: 
Friday, January 1, 1982
U.S. Agency for International Development
U.S. fisheries assistance programs have potential benefits, both immediate and long-term, far outweighing their costs. Thus concludes this report, which reviews A.I.D.'s fisheries and aquaculture assistance program in order to identify promising mechanisms for future projects. Four project mechanisms used by A.I.D. to support fisheries and aquaculture are reviewed. Detailed analysis is made of the Korean Fisheries Revitalization Program (1956-64), which was directly funded and supervised by A.I.D. in-country, and of 211(d) fisheries and aquaculture programs at the University of Rhode Island and Auburn University (1969-79). Less detailed analysis is presented of projects in which A.I.D. played a minor role in assisting fisheries development projects implemented by an international or regional entity, e.g., the Guinean Trawler Survey (1962-66), the East African Freshwater Fisheries Organization Project (1967-72), or by a foreign government, e.g., in the Philippines and India (1952-62). Successful programs, it is noted, have featured, on the side of host countries, good resource bases, a traditional importance of fish in the local diet and economy, and strong governmental commitment. Key U.S. ingredients have been major financial backing and long-term commitments, stress on programs encompassing all aspects of a fishery, provision of expert and experienced advisors, cooperation with local institutions, and flexible administration. It is recommended that the United States provide fisheries assistance to developing countries on both humanitarian and politically strategic grounds and because of the United States' perhaps unique technical and institutional capability. It is also recommended that A.I.D., which should remain the primary sponsor and coordinator of U.S. assistance programs: remove fisheries programs from the agricultural office; develop a fisheries headquarters and field staff and a coherent fisheries strategy; use universities for expertise not readily available in-house; and focus assistance on fisheries management, capture fisheries, and aquacultural activities.
Theme(s) & Sub-theme(s): 
Aquaculture
Resource type: 
Topical Report
Resource Scale: 
Global

Related resources

Final Evaluation of the Oman Fisheries Development Project (Project No. 272-0101.1)
Fisheries Research and Technology Transfer in Development Process
South Pacific Fisheries Development
Need help using this resource?
U.S. Water Partnership

Footer menu

  • Search USWP Member Sites
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Credits

© 2014 U.S. Water Partnership Web Portal