Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Themes
    • Water, Sanitation, Hygiene
    • Integrated Water Resource Management
    • Productivity and Efficiency
    • Governance
  • About
  • Training Resources
  • U.S. Domestic Resources
  • Guidance
    • How to Open a Database File
    • How to Open a Document

User menu

  • Log in
  • Sign up

U.S. Water Partnership Resource Portal

  • Productivity and Efficiency

Sudan: The Rahad Irrigation Project

Link Broken? 
Access this resource
Share
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo
Document (.pdf, .doc)
6,607
Published: 
Monday, March 1, 1982
U.S. Agency for International Development
Although the Rahad Irrigation Project in Sudan, partly AID-funded and nearly complete, has been operating for only four seasons, it faces problems which threaten its viability. This report assesses these problems, the project's impact, and the lessons learned. Designed to maximize use of government investments in Nile water management, to upgrade the living standards of 100,000 herders and farmers, and to produce cotton and groundnuts for export, the project is pursuing full mechanization and 100% intensive rotation of crops. Production is supervised by the Rahad Corporation which controls pricing, marketing, and most decision-making. The Corporation has not coped well with management of a mechanized operation, erroneously perceived labor shortages, and tenant dissatisfaction. Faced with little incentive to grow cotton, farmers have produced less and are working as day laborers and raising livestock, sorghum, and groundnuts. Mechanization has further reduced project-generated income and threatens to displace labor. In addition, limitations on local currency have resulted in the inadequate and unequal provision of educational, health, and other promised services. Among the lessons taught by the project are that: a policy of 100% mechanization needs more analysis; farmers must be given a role in the decision-making process and be allowed choices; harvest-time labor shortages must be viewed in relation to prevailing wage rates; environmental analyses must be conducted and used in designing and implementing irrigation projects; programs to control water-borne diseases should be designed and funded in irrigation projects; and crop protection techniques should be reviewed prior to project implementation and coordinated with public health officials. Appended are photographs; a list of contacts; a 56-item bibliography (1968-81); and reports on: the institutional and social effects of controlled resettlement, micro-level management of technical resources, economic analysis of agricultural enterprises, labor/tenant relations, and Sudan's environment and natural resources.
Theme(s) & Sub-theme(s): 
Agriculture
Nexus Tag(s): 
Economy
Resource type: 
Topical Report
Region & Countries: 
SudanSub-Saharan Africa
Resource Scale: 
National

Related resources

Investments in Large Scale Infrastructure: Irrigation and River Management in the Sahel
Groundwater Markets in Pakistan: Participation and Productivity
Project Assistance Completion Report: Maharashtra Minor Irrigation Project (386-0490)
Need help using this resource?
U.S. Water Partnership

Footer menu

  • Search USWP Member Sites
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Credits

© 2014 U.S. Water Partnership Web Portal